翻訳と辞書
Words near each other
・ R v Saibene
・ R v Sansregret
・ R v Saskatchewan Wheat Pool
・ R v Sault Ste-Marie (City of)
・ R v Savage
・ R v Schoombie
・ R v Schoonwinkel
・ R v Seaboyer
・ R v Secretary of State for Employment, ex p Seymour-Smith
・ R v Secretary of State for Foreign and Commonwealth Affairs, ex p Bancoult (No 1)
・ R v Secretary of State for Foreign and Commonwealth Affairs, ex p Bancoult (No 2)
・ R v Secretary of State for Foreign and Commonwealth Affairs, ex p Rees-Mogg
・ R v Secretary of State for Foreign and Commonwealth Affairs, ex p World Development Movement Ltd
・ R v Secretary of State for Home Affairs, ex p O'Brien
・ R v Secretary of State for the Home Department, ex p Doody
R v Secretary of State for the Home Department, ex p Fire Brigades Union
・ R v Secretary of State for the Home Department, ex p Northumbria Police Authority
・ R v Sharpe
・ R v Shein
・ R v Shelembe
・ R v Shivpuri
・ R v Sinclair
・ R v Skinner
・ R v Smith (1900)
・ R v Smith (1987)
・ R v Smith (1992)
・ R v Smith (Thomas Joseph)
・ R v Soqokomashe
・ R v Sparrow
・ R v Spencer


Dictionary Lists
翻訳と辞書 辞書検索 [ 開発暫定版 ]
スポンサード リンク

R v Secretary of State for the Home Department, ex p Fire Brigades Union : ウィキペディア英語版
R v Secretary of State for the Home Department, ex p Fire Brigades Union

R v Secretary of State for the Home Department ex parte Fire Brigades Union () 2 AC 513〔http://www.bailii.org/uk/cases/UKHL/1995/3.html〕 was a House of Lords case concerning the awarding of compensation under the Criminal Injuries Compensation Scheme. The case is considered significant in constitutional terms for its ruling on the extent of Ministerial prerogative powers.
==Background==
The Criminal Injuries Compensation Scheme was set up under Ministerial prerogative powers to provide ex gratia compensation payments to victims of crime. Compensation was assessed on an individual basis by the Criminal Injuries Compensation Board.

The Criminal Justice Act 1988 was to introduce a statutory scheme for criminal injuries compensation with several sections coming into law (by statutory instrument) on a date of the Home Secretary's choosing. However, the government rather than implementing this legislation amended a non-statutory tariff based scheme under the royal prerogative.〔http://www.publications.parliament.uk/pa/jt199899/jtselect/jtpriv/43/43ap43.htm〕 This tariff based scheme would save money by awarding less compensation. A trade Union sought judicial review of the decision of the Home Secretary not to bring into force the compensation scheme in the 1988 Act.

抄文引用元・出典: フリー百科事典『 ウィキペディア(Wikipedia)
ウィキペディアで「R v Secretary of State for the Home Department, ex p Fire Brigades Union」の詳細全文を読む



スポンサード リンク
翻訳と辞書 : 翻訳のためのインターネットリソース

Copyright(C) kotoba.ne.jp 1997-2016. All Rights Reserved.